Editorial standards, AI use and corrections

Espresso is the publication side of Project Cafecito. We explain what changed across technology, business and policy, what it connects to, and why it matters.

AI use and review

Espresso uses AI to find connections, draft and publish articles. Humans spot-check coverage and investigate reports of errors; not every article is reviewed by a person before publication. AI-generated wording is not evidence. Automation can make mistakes.

Sources and uncertainty

We aim to link evidence for important claims, preferring original documents, official records and attributable reporting where available. We distinguish confirmed facts from allegations, estimates, forecasts and interim results, attribute disputed claims, and identify unresolved questions. We explain disagreements rather than treating repeated claims as independent confirmation. Readers can follow the links to assess the evidence themselves.

Accountability and corrections

Project Cafecito (a tech venture of Strategic Implementation Advising LLC) is accountable for Espresso. To report an error, use the feedback form and include the article URL, disputed passage, explanation and supporting evidence if available.

We assess reports against available evidence. For substantive errors, we correct the article, explain the change in a dated note and record it below. Updates for new developments are distinguished from corrections. We do not promise a response deadline.

Corrections log

Historical corrections have not all been reviewed; this log is not a complete record of earlier errors.

November 3, 2026: ECB rate article — An inconsistent rate-path table was replaced with the deposit facility rate path, aligned with the article’s reported 2.50% rate.